If the jñānin has no kartavya (duty) remaining, does this verse sanction quietism — and how do Madhva's and Rāmānuja's readings resist that reading while Śaṅkara's appears to accept it?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

The three terms — ātma-rati, ātma-tṛpti, ātma-santoṣa — are they synonyms, or do Madhva and Madhusūdana treat them as a genuine ascending triad of inner states?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

Madhusūdana's claim that ātma-rati is upacārāt (figurative attribution) implies the state transcends the subject-object structure of rati itself — does this dissolve the verse's apparent positive claim, or sharpen it?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

Rāmānuja's category of the sādhanā-independent aspirant (svata-siddha) has no parallel in Śaṅkara's structure — is this a genuine Viśiṣṭādvaita contribution or a re-description of jīvanmukti under different terms?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

Madhva anchors mānava in the root √man (to know/understand), making it a marker of the epistemic category 'jñānin' rather than merely 'human being' — how does this affect the universality claim of the verse?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

Vallabha's grammatical argument (the 'tu' separates sāṃkhya-mārga from karma-mārga structurally, not just by context) — does this reading hold against Śaṅkara, who assimilates the sāṃkhya-jñānin into sannyāsa rather than keeping it as a parallel track?

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform. See seven-school commentary at https://gita.ekrasworks.com/gita/3/17.

BG 3.17 — Karma-Yoga — Sūtrakṛt-Gītā

Bhagavad Gītā 3.17Chapter 3 · Karma-Yoga · Krishna → Arjuna · anuṣṭubh

यस् त्वात्मरतिरेव स्यादात्मतृप्तश् च मानवः ।

आत्मन्येव च संतुष्टस् तस्य कार्यं न विद्यते ॥

yas tv ātma-ratir eva syād ātma-tṛptaś ca mānavaḥ

ātmany eva ca saṃtuṣṭas tasya kāryaṃ na vidyate

spokensingle-voice recital; rendered via IndicF5 conditioned on a Sanskrit reference clip

meaning

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform.

ekras · bhāṣya

The verse names the rare exception. "But the man who is atma-rati alone, atma-tripta, contented in the atman alone — for him there is no karya. Nothing remains to be done." Three terms describe one inner condition, each layer deeper. Atma-rati — delighting in the atman alone, no longer needing the senses for delight. Atma-tripta — satiated by the atman, no longer hungry for what objects could provide. Atmany eva santushta — content in the atman alone, no longer reaching elsewhere for completion.

Madhusudana distinguishes the three precisely as grades of inner state: rati is relishing, tripti is satiation, santosha is contentment. The indriyarama of 3.16 finds these three nowhere — every relish is partial, every satiation is fleeting, every contentment is conditional on the next thing. The atmarama finds all three in one place. The conclusion is sharp: tasya karyam na vidyate. For him, no action remains to be done. The man whose interior is full has no more work because the work was always for filling the interior.

Ramanuja restricts the application carefully: this is the rare adhikarin who stands independent of both karma-yoga and jnana-yoga sadhana — not a path-walker but one who has already arrived.

Krishna is naming the destination. Not Arjuna's current state. The verse is doing structural work for what comes next: it lays down the only condition under which the requirement of action falls away, and then 3.18 will explore that condition further before 3.19 brings Arjuna firmly back into the karya zone.

Context

where

Chapter 3 · Karma-Yoga · meter anuṣṭubh

who speaks

Krishna → Arjuna

preceded by — BG 3.16

Whoever will not keep this wheel turning lives in sin, Arjuna; gratifying only the senses, his life is wasted.

What's going on

One who finds joy, fullness, and contentment in the self alone has no duty left to perform.

Vyavahāra · try it in your life

Dvaita

Madhva's reading disciplines the practitioner against premature claims of contentment: the santoṣa of this verse is available only in the depth of Viṣṇu-focused absorption, not in casual equanimity. The everyday implication is a critique of cheap contentment — the Dvaita practitioner is called to keep discriminating whether their present satisfaction is genuine Paramātman-rati or merely the absence of gross irritation, and to regard ordinary calm as a good beginning, not the destination.

Advaita

When sitting in meditation and the instruction is 'rest as awareness itself,' the Advaita reading of this verse is the warrant: one is not suppressing the desire for external things but recognizing that the one who would desire them is already the fullness sought. The practitioner who finds stillness not as effortful calm but as the ātman's natural condition has, in Śaṅkara's framing, fulfilled the verse — and can drop the burden of religious or social obligation not by negligence but by recognition.

show all 6

Viśiṣṭādvaita

The Rāmānuja reading speaks to the practitioner who has — through sustained bhakti or grace — arrived at a point where formal sādhanā feels redundant, not because they are slack but because the ātman is continually self-disclosed in daily life. In practice this looks like someone who no longer needs retreats or rituals to feel connected: the ātman's presence pervades cooking, conversation, and work equally, making all of these kainkarya (service) without effortful reframing.

Śuddhādvaita

Vallabha's grammatical 'tu' teaches that self-knowledge and devotional action are not stages on the same path but parallel tracks suited to different adhikāris (qualified practitioners). The everyday application for the Puṣṭi-mārga devotee is liberating: one need not aspire to the detached ātma-rati of the jñānin to be on a valid path — Kṛṣṇa's 'but' explicitly carves out that this verse is about a different type of person, freeing the bhakta to remain in active, love-saturated service without self-judgment.

Bhakti

Śrīdhara's restrained reading offers a diagnostic tool: the question is not 'have I attained ātma-rati?' but 'is my antaḥkaraṇa (inner instrument) sufficiently purified that external enjoyments no longer carry imperative force?' The practitioner uses this verse as a self-assessment: when bhoga-apekṣā (the expectation of enjoyment) quietly drops from a decision — not because it was suppressed but because it simply did not arise — that is the edge Śrīdhara is pointing at.

Advaita-Bhakti

Madhusūdana's upacāra (figurative) reading rescues contemplatives from the trap of hunting for a felt experience of 'ātman-as-object' — since technically no such experience exists in non-dual realization. In practice this means: do not evaluate your meditative depth by whether you 'feel bliss in the self'; instead, notice whether the compulsive pull of sensory alternatives has lost its gravity. The absence of dvaita-darśana (the compulsion to see a gap between self and world) is the signal, not a positive inner glow named ātma-rati.

Adhiṣṭhāna · substrate signature

substratev2.6-frozen

parserByT5-Sanskrit-multitask (Nehrdich/Hellwig/Keutzer EMNLP 2024)

mūlaGRETIL e-text of the Bhagavadgītā with Śaṅkara's commentary (data entry: Gaudiya Grantha Mandira) for chapters 1-17; sanskritdocuments.org sd_bgnew.itx for chapter 18; ingested via a local Ambuda TEI build; per-verse repairs logged in post_generation_repairs

show all metadata

weightsa=1 · b=0.01 · e_v=0.005 · z=0.2 · h=0 · th=0.01

anchorfit on Ramsukhdas's Sādhak Sañjīvanī (1980), frozen across the eight-commentator panel; cross-validated R@4 = 71.6% on Śaṅkara

extracted2026-04-21

methodPaper 1, Section II.B

↓ view raw per-verse object (JSON)↗ per-verse-object schema ↗ substrate code (MIT) + data (CC-BY 4.0)

The schema generalizes to any bounded-polysemy corpus with discrete primary text units, attested witness traditions, identifiable schools, and formal substrate. Port the per-verse object; refit weights on a domain-appropriate Layer-3 anchor; ship.

Bhagavad Gītā Chapter 3, Verse 17: Krishna to Arjuna — Karma-Yoga