Bhagavad Gītā Chapter 2, Verse 22: Krishna to Arjuna — Sāṅkhya-Yoga
Just as a person sheds worn clothes and puts on new ones, the soul leaves worn-out bodies and takes up others.
Bhāṣyakāra purports
- Śaṅkaraadvaita
As a person (nara) discards worn garments (jīrṇāni vāsāṃsi) and takes up others that are new, so the ātman — itself entirely without modification (avikriya) — moves into other bodies. Śaṅkara's gloss is unsparing: the body-change no more alters the ātman than a traveller's change of clothes alters the traveller; the compound 'dehi' (the embodied one) names the witness, never the garment. The entire drama of birth and death is therefore a drama of appearances, not a drama of the real (sat), and grief over the fallen body is grief over the discarded coat.
- Rāmānujaviśiṣṭādvaita
Those who fall in dharma-yuddha (righteous battle) obtain bodies of greater auspiciousness (adhikatara-kalyāṇa-śarīra) — Rāmānuja's commentary reads the exchange not as mere neutrality but as harṣa-nimitta, a ground for joy. Just as a person exchanges worn garments for fresh, beautiful ones with gladness, the jīva — which is Bhagavān's body (śarīra) and therefore dear to Him — ascends to a more fit instrument for further kainkaryam (service). The prior verse's 'avināśi' (imperishable) is here confirmed as pointing toward the jīva's positive onward trajectory within Bhagavān.
- Madhvadvaita
Madhva's terse annotation labels the verse a dṛṣṭānta (illustrative analogy) offered to generate in the listener the direct experience of the distinction between the body and the ātman (dehātma-viveka-anubhava). The jīva is eternally, categorically distinct from both the body and from Hari; it depends entirely on Hari's independent will (svatantra-icchā) for each successive embodiment. The garment is the body; the person (nara) is the bound jīva; Hari, the wearer's custodian, is not mentioned in the verse but is the unstated premise who alone decides which 'garment' is next fitted.
- Vallabhaśuddhādvaita
Vallabha responds to the objection that even if the ātman is imperishable, one may grieve over the bodies that are the instruments of the ātman's experience (bhoga-sādhana-deha). His reply via this verse: karma itself (karma-nibandhanāni) makes the arising of new bodies unavoidable; a worn body's fall therefore carries no legitimate grief-occasion (śoka-avakāśa). Bodies are Kṛṣṇa's prasāda, instruments of His līlā; their renewal is itself Kṛṣṇa's creative act. Just as the jīva does not mourn old garments when fresh ones arrive, the devotee who rests in Kṛṣṇa's will finds in every body-change only the continuity of divine abundance.
- Śrīdharabhakti
Śrīdhara frames the verse as a direct answer to the objection: 'even if the ātman is imperishable, I grieve over the destruction of its associated body.' His philological response is compact — karma-nibandha (karma-bound obligation) makes new bodies unavoidable, so there is simply no foothold (avakāśa) for grief at an old body's end. The garment image is devotionally transparent: the same self that wears these temporary forms remains the beloved of Bhagavān, constant through each exchange, and the devotee's relationship with that self — and with its Lord — is not severed by any change of bodily dress.
- Madhusūdanaadvaita-bhakti
Madhusūdana performs the most elaborate reading in the panel. The qualifier 'aparāṇi' (others, distinct) in the verse is not redundant — it signals superior garments, not merely different ones. Bhīṣma and the other mahārathis, worn down by lifelong dharmic effort (dharma-anuṣṭhāna-kleśa), are unable in their present bodies to enjoy the fruits of their accumulated merit; by dying in yuddha-dharma they shed those worn forms and ascend to deva-bodies (divya-deha) that are fit to receive those fruits, citing Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad ('anyat navataram kalyāṇataraṃ rūpaṃ kurute'). Arjuna's act is thus supreme welfare (atyantam upakāra) for the very men he fears to destroy. Jñāna and bhakti converge: the non-dual ātman's immutability (avikriyatva) is established by the analogy, while the personal Lord's purpose — orchestrating superior rebirth for great souls — gives the analogy its emotional warmth.