BG 2.19 — Sāṅkhya-Yoga — Sūtrakṛt-Gītā

Bhagavad Gītā 2.19Chapter 2 · Sāṅkhya-Yoga · Krishna → Arjuna · anuṣṭubh

य एनं वेत्ति हन्तारं यश् चैनं मन्यते हतम् ।

उभौ तौ न विजानीतो नायं हन्ति न हन्यते ॥

ya enaṃ vetti hantāraṃ yaś cainaṃ manyate hatam

ubhau tau na vijānīto nāyaṃ hanti na hanyate

spokensingle-voice recital; rendered via IndicF5 conditioned on a Sanskrit reference clip

meaning

Whoever thinks this self is a killer, and whoever thinks it can be killed, both are wrong. It neither kills nor is killed.

ekras · bhāṣya

Krishna names the symmetric error. "He who thinks this is the killer, and he who thinks this is the killed — neither knows. This does not kill and is not killed." Two mistakes, mirror-image. The man who thinks he is killing — he does not know. The man who thinks he is being killed — he does not know either. The dehin in the killer is not a killer. The dehin in the killed is not killed. The action and the suffering of the action both happen at the level of the body. The dehin is not on either side of that transaction.

Ramsukhdas Maharaj reads this through karma. The shariri — the one in the body — has no kartri-bhava, no doer-ness. Like an artisan needs his tools to do anything; without the body, the dehin alone cannot kill. The action belongs to prakriti — to the body and its instruments. The dehin attaches itself to the body and identifies with what the body does, then says I killed or I was killed. But the I that says it is not, in itself, the doer. Cut the false identification, and the doer-ness goes with it. Cut the false identification, and the suffering of being acted upon goes with it. The verse is doing something specific to Arjuna's situation. He has been picturing himself as the killer of his elders.

Krishna is naming that picture as a misidentification. The body raises the bow; the body releases the arrow; the body of Bhishma takes the wound. The dehin in Arjuna is not the killer; the dehin in Bhishma is not the killed. Both have always been, both will always be, both pass through this scene unmoved. The grief Arjuna is feeling is for a transaction that, at the deepest level, is not happening.

Context

where

Chapter 2 · Sāṅkhya-Yoga · meter anuṣṭubh

who speaks

Krishna → Arjuna

preceded by — BG 2.18

These bodies end, Krishna tells Arjuna, but the one who wears them is eternal, indestructible, and beyond all measure, so fight.

What's going on

Whoever thinks this self is a killer, and whoever thinks it can be killed, both are wrong. It neither kills nor is killed.

Sūtras through this verse (111)

MadhvaclassicalT1

Hari is supreme — the running reading-rulebetween

2.18'Imperishable' is said to mark off the Lord.───→here2.19───→4.24Every word for ritual points back to Viṣṇu.

RamsukhdasclassicalG

Equanimity in everythingbetween

2.14Bear pleasure and pain as a passing season.───→here2.19───→2.38Equal in win and loss, no sin can stick.

ĀnandagiriclassicalA

The two-niṣṭhā axisbetween

1.1Means and end set out as one paired axis.───→here2.19───→2.39Wisdom closes, action opens. Same axis.

show all 111

MadhvaclassicalT2

Soul depends on Lord — the gap that does not closestation · anchor

───→here2.19───→

Madhvaclassicalmadhva_pratibimba

Madhva Pratibimbabetween · other

2.18Image perishes, source endures───→here2.19───→4.13Creates yet uncreated

MadhvaclassicalT5

Mirror-and-image — how seeming-action worksbetween

2.18The image perishes, but the source endures.───→here2.19───→4.13He creates and yet is uncreated by it.

MadhvaclassicalT11

Only revealed scripture decides — reason alone cannotbetween

2.13Self-survival is settled by śruti, not by reason.───→here2.19───→2.24When two scriptures clash the higher one rules.

MadhvaclassicalT3

Ranking is real — and it never collapsesapproach

───→here2.19───→2.23Even great gods are unequal in their glory.

MadhvaclassicalT4

Liberation is bliss in body — not absorptionapproach

───→here2.19───→2.50Release is embodied, blissful, never merging.

MadhvaclassicalT6

Citation is the spine — texts carry the loadapproach

───→here2.19───→2.23Nāradīya names what reason cannot prove.

MadhvaclassicalT7

Action and knowledge — never rivalsapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39The two paths name one practice, one fruit.

MadhvaclassicalT8

Direct vision — the only proximate causeapproach

───→here2.19───→2.46Scripture is a small well when the flood arrives.

MadhvaclassicalT9

Devotion and grace — what knowledge cannot do aloneapproach

───→here2.19───→2.23Without worship of Hari no one ever crosses.

MadhvaclassicalT10

The deluder is named — three goddesses, one Lordapproach

───→here2.19───→4.6Even the unborn descends through the deluder Durgā.

MadhvaclassicalT12

Closure by gloss — the small repertoireapproach

───→here2.19───→2.55'Self' here means mind — a single word redirects.

JayatīrthaclassicalA

Body and embodied — the inference runs on the dehī sidestation

───→here2.19───→

JayatīrthaclassicalB

Pañcabheda — the five distinctions enforced verse by versestation

───→here2.19───→

Śaṅkaraclassicalshankara_jnana_nishtha

Shankara Jnana Nishthabetween · other

2.10Thesis flat───→here2.19───→3.4Naishkarmya is not just non-doing

Gauravmodernmemorial_pastoral

Memorial Pastoralbetween

2.13The memorial-register anchor. 'Dehino'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara, ta───→here2.19───→2.20'Na jayate mriyate va kadachit.' The atman is unborn, undying. Gaurav reaches fo

Gauravmodernsanatana_dharma_101

Sanatana Dharma 101between

2.13Reincarnation pillar. 'Dehino'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara, tatha deha───→here2.19───→2.22'Vasamsi jirnani yatha vihaya' — body as worn-out clothes. Sister verse to 2.13,

Gauravmodernwitness_self_neti_neti

Witness Self Neti Netibetween

2.13Body changes. 'Dehino'smin yatha dehe kaumaram yauvanam jara.' Gaurav opens the ───→here2.19───→2.20'Na jayate mriyate va kadachit, nayam bhutva bhavita va na bhuyah, ajo nityah sh

ŚaṅkaraclassicalA

Sorrow and delusion are the diseasebetween

2.11The wise mourn neither the living nor the dead.───→here2.19───→2.69Ignorance is night, wisdom alone wakes.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalB

Knowledge alone, with all action laid downbetween

2.10First lay down all action, then knowledge frees.───→here2.19───→3.4Mere not-doing is not renunciation at all.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalC

Knowledge plus action will not save youbetween

2.10Some say: combine knowledge with rites.───→here2.19───→3.1If insight is higher, why this dreadful work?

ŚaṅkaraclassicalJ

Scripture stands behind every claimbetween

2.10Pāṇḍitya is knowing the Self — Bṛhadāraṇyaka.───→here2.19───→3.4Brāhmaṇas seek the Self by Veda, then by rite.

JayatīrthaclassicalC

Refuting Śaṅkara-style readings, named or unnamedbetween

2.13One-self-many-bodies runs out of grammar.───→here2.19───→2.72Old-age renunciation is off topic here.

JayatīrthaclassicalG

Citation as proof — śruti, smṛti, MB, Aṣṭādhyāyī, Pañcarātrabetween

2.13Pratyabhijñā backed by śruti citation.───→here2.19───→2.20Na jāyate mriyate echoes Kaṭha.

JayatīrthaclassicalH

Pūrva-pakṣa explicit — nanu / iti cet / ity ata āhabetween

2.18Body-mortality given as the rival claim.───→here2.19───→2.47Triple iti śeṣaḥ fills three gaps.

JayatīrthaclassicalI

Lakṣaṇā-control — literal preferred when availablebetween

2.13Recognition is literal across bodies.───→here2.19───→2.39Sāṅkhya-yoga literal, not external schools.

JayatīrthaclassicalJ

Reading the silence — iti śeṣaḥ and iti bhāvaḥbetween

2.13Supply: no, he says. Netyāheti śeṣaḥ.───→here2.19───→2.23Three iti bhāvaḥ render the import.

Ramsukhdasclassical

Sādhaka Sañjīvanī commentary at this versebetween

───→here2.19───→

Gauravmodernchaplaincy_kit_of_tools

Chaplaincy Kit Of Toolsapproach

───→here2.19───→4.34Paramparā / direct transmission. 'Tad viddhi pranipatena pariprashnena sevaya, u

Gauravmoderncivilizational_air_conditioning

Civilizational Air Conditioningapproach

───→here2.19───→2.62'Dhyayato vishayan pumsah sangas teshupajayate, sangat sanjayate kamah.' The out

Gauravmodernheart_leadership

Heart Leadershipapproach

───→here2.19───→2.48'Yoga-sthah kuru karmani sangam tyaktva Dhananjaya, siddhy-asiddhyoh samo bhutva

Gauravmoderninterfaith_cosmology

Interfaith Cosmologyapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11'Ye yatha mam prapadyante tams tathaiva bhajamy aham.' As they approach me, so I

Gauravmodernkarma_yoga_hand

Karma Yoga Handapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47Middle finger. Nishkama karma plus the failure-gym. 'Karmany evadhikaras te, ma

Gauravmodernthree_yogas_braid

Three Yogas Braidapproach

───→here2.19───→3.3'Loke'smin dvi-vidha nishtha pura prokta mayanagha, jnana-yogena samkhyanam karm

ŚaṅkaraclassicalD

The fit student vs the unfit studentapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39So far for the seeker of the real; now hear yoga.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalE

Ignorance is the only enemyapproach

───→here2.19───→2.69Wisdom rises; ignorance fades like dawn-darkness.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalF

The Lord is born only as it wereapproach

───→here2.19───→4.6I appear as if born, never really, by māyā.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalG

After knowing, act only to hold the worldapproach

───→here2.19───→3.20Janaka acted only to hold the world together.

ŚaṅkaraclassicalK

Liberation while still embodiedapproach

───→here2.19───→2.72Standing in this state, one reaches Brahman..

JayatīrthaclassicalD

Saṅgati declared at the head of every adhyāyaapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Wrap prior section, then announce next.

JayatīrthaclassicalE

Vishnu-sarvottamatva read into apparently neutral wordsapproach

───→here2.19───→3.15Brahmodbhavam — born of parabrahman.

JayatīrthaclassicalF

Bhakti-tāratamya: gradation among devotees, gradation in fruitapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11Fruit proportional to the service offered.

RamsukhdasclassicalA

What binds you (and how to let go)approach

───→here2.19───→2.47Hold no mine-ness on body or on fruit.

RamsukhdasclassicalB

This human birth — your one chance to actapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47Only a human body can do new action.

RamsukhdasclassicalC

Desire is the root — not actionapproach

───→here2.19───→2.55Drop desire, and the sense of doing falls.

RamsukhdasclassicalD

The three modes (sattva, rajas, tamas) at workapproach

───→here2.19───→2.45Rise above the modes, said in chapter two.

RamsukhdasclassicalE

Your own work as worshipapproach

───→here2.19───→2.31A warrior's own duty is the war he faces.

RamsukhdasclassicalF

Surrender — the single shelterapproach

───→here2.19───→2.41A one-pointed mind is the seeker's mark.

RamsukhdasclassicalH

All paths arrive at the same roomapproach

───→here2.19───→2.55Each path names its sage in its own words.

RamsukhdasclassicalJ

Divine vs demonic patternsapproach

───→here2.19───→3.37The enemy is desire turning into anger.

RamsukhdasclassicalK

The body is not yoursapproach

───→here2.19───→3.27The modes act, but ego claims the deed.

Gauravmoderneminem_dsm_arjuna

Eminem Dsm Arjunaexit

2.11'Ashochyan anvashochas tvam prajna-vadamsh cha bhashase.' You grieve those not t───→here2.19───→

Ekrasmodernend_of_life

End of life — the threshold tourbetween · v2

2.13Bodies pass, the dehī does not───→here2.19───→2.22Worn-out garments

Ekrasmodernstress

Stress — panic to shelterbetween · v2

1.30Skin burns, mind reels───→here2.19───→2.20The unborn dehī

ĀnandagiriclassicalB

Three hexads = tat tvam asibetween

2.1First hexad opens, tvam-pada implicit.───→here2.19───→6.46Inner-self hexad closes; pivot prepared.

ĀnandagiriclassicalE

Pūrvapakṣa via nanu / āśaṅkyabetween

1.1Dialectical chain present from line one.───→here2.19───→2.39Nanu… tatrāha: one pair, named.

ĀnandagiriclassicalL

Akṣarayojanā — word-fit firstbetween

2.10Word-fit holds even at the dialogue's pivot.───→here2.19───→3.1Chapter-1 verse opens with word-fit, then bīja.

Ekrasmodernkarma_yoga

Karma yoga — the apprentice pathapproach · v2

───→here2.19───→2.47Right to action

Ekrasmodernvairagya

Vairāgya — dispassion as instrumentapproach · v2

───→here2.19───→2.55Sthitaprajna defined

Ekrasmodernleadership

Leadership — svadharma in actionapproach · v2

───→here2.19───→3.20Janaka, lokasangraha

Ekrasmoderntrigunametry

Trigunametry — guṇas as embodied statesapproach · v2

───→here2.19───→2.41Single-pointed buddhi

Ekrasmodernparadox_of_doership

Paradox of doership — kartṛtvaapproach · v2

───→here2.19───→3.27Modes act, ego claims

Ekrasmodernanger_management

Anger Managementapproach · other

───→here2.19───→2.62Brooding breeds attachment

ĀnandagiriclassicalC

Adhikāra: seeker vs. fulfilledapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47Primary fitness needs ripened conditions.

ĀnandagiriclassicalD

Praśna-bīja chapter openingsapproach

───→here2.19───→3.1Buddhi-vyākulatva named the seed.

ĀnandagiriclassicalF

Which karma? — fourfold typologyapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47No-fruit ≠ no-karma: kāmya-tyāga ≠ nitya-tyāga.

ĀnandagiriclassicalG

Anūdyate, na vidhīyateapproach

───→here2.19───→2.55A description, not a command. Anchor.

ĀnandagiriclassicalH

Phala-saṃkalpa is the only upādhiapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47Action stays; the wish for fruit goes.

ĀnandagiriclassicalK

Upasaṃhāra — recap as instrumentapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Wisdom section wound up here.

Ekrasmodernfamily_conflict

Family Conflictexit · other

2.8No grief-remover I see───→here2.19───→

VallabhaclassicalD

Chapter-opening preludesbetween

2.1Six-verse prelude lays out the whole map.───→here2.19───→3.1Four-verse prelude frames renunciation.

VallabhaclassicalF

Soul as part of the highest Personbetween

2.16Real and unreal sort into pure and impure.───→here2.19───→7.4Lower nature is eight-fold; higher is the soul-collective.

VallabhaclassicalI

A closed three-source citation gridbetween

2.11Vallabha quotes his own Nibandha at verse two.───→here2.19───→3.30The Nibandha is cited again on threefold drop.

MadhusūdanaclassicalK

Arjuna's grief has two roots, not onebetween

2.11Anchor: two confusions — one universal, one yours alone.───→here2.19───→11.1Arjuna marks the universal moha cured.

Madhusūdanaclassicalmadhusudan_bhagavad_arpana

Madhusudan Bhagavad Arpanaapproach · other

───→here2.19───→2.47Fruit-free action cannot bind

VallabhaclassicalA

Two paths — rule-bound and grace-onlyapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11Each soul takes the path Krishna assigns to it.

VallabhaclassicalC

Drop the doer, not the deedapproach

───→here2.19───→3.1Drop something inside the act, not the act.

VallabhaclassicalE

Three paths, one teaching orderapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39The yoga-mind is just the sāṅkhya-mind, retold.

VallabhaclassicalG

The Lord plays — calf-affection, not contractapproach

───→here2.19───→4.7When dharma weakens, the Lord descends to play.

VallabhaclassicalH

Stilling the mind — into the Lordapproach

───→here2.19───→2.48Yoga itself is just sameness of mind.

MadhusūdanaclassicalA

Three groups of six: you, the Lord, the joiningapproach

───→here2.19───→3.1The whole map laid out at chapter three's door.

MadhusūdanaclassicalB

Different students need different teachingsapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Two minds, two paths, never one rule for all.

MadhusūdanaclassicalC

Action purifies before knowing can landapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Pure mind for knowing, impure mind for acting.

MadhusūdanaclassicalD

Offer the act to the Lord and it stops bindingapproach

───→here2.19───→2.47Action offered, fruit-free, cannot bear bondage.

MadhusūdanaclassicalG

Knowing and acting cannot run togetherapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Like light and dark, they cannot share a place.

MadhusūdanaclassicalI

Liberation while alive — the body finishes its runapproach

───→here2.19───→3.1The architecture ends in living-liberation, then bodily.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalA

The carama-śloka as retroactive bracketbetween

2.12From here to 18.66: one Krishna-utterance.───→here2.19───→5.16Knowledge dispels what mā śucaḥ will close.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalE

Pūrva-pakṣa — name the rival, close the doorbetween

2.12Plurals refute the unitary-self read.───→here2.19───→2.39Sāṅkhya-yoga split: not two methods, two angles.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalH

Mā śucaḥ — the inclusio of evolving griefbetween

2.11First grief — chapter-1 cowardice — closed.───→here2.19───→5.16Knowledge-darkness cleared — not yet refuge.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalC

Antaryāmin — the indweller as standing referentapproach

───→here2.19───→3.30'Mayi sarvāṇi karmāṇi': read as antaryāmin.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalD

Adhikāra — eligibility as architecture, not exceptionapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11'Yathā' is open; the verb is the gate.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalF

Saṅgati — anticipation-and-resolutionapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39What chapter 3 will resolve, named here.

VedāntadeśikaclassicalG

Three yogas — three angles on one configurationapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Sāṅkhya and yoga: not two roads.

ŚrīdharaclassicalA

The Gītā as raft across griefbetween

2.11Confusing self with body is the source of grief.───→here2.19───→13.2For their rescue, truth-knowledge is uttered.

ŚrīdharaclassicalD

The path that turns no one awayapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11However they come, I meet them so.

ŚrīdharaclassicalE

Inner cleansing reconciles work and knowingapproach

───→here2.19───→2.39Work polishes the inner instrument first.

ŚrīdharaclassicalF

The Lord inside as inner rulerapproach

───→here2.19───→3.30Lay every act in Me; I move within.

ŚrīdharaclassicalI

His evenness as ground for refugeapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11I meet each one as that one approaches.

ŚrīdharaclassicalJ

Insight given as a gift, not earned aloneapproach

───→here2.19───→4.34Knowers will pass it to you by teaching.

AbhinavaguptaclassicalA

Knowing and acting are one powerapproach

───→here2.19───→2.24The self is one unbroken awareness.

AbhinavaguptaclassicalB

Recognition, not additionapproach

───→here2.19───→4.14Recognize, do not learn — the verb shifts.

AbhinavaguptaclassicalD

Avatāra: appearance without departureapproach

───→here2.19───→4.1Teaching descends; the teacher does not move.

AbhinavaguptaclassicalF

Three guṇas: contractions of one consciousnessapproach

───→here2.19───→2.45Exit the modes — not better modes are the goal.

AbhinavaguptaclassicalG

Saṃvit: one referent under many namesapproach

───→here2.19───→2.20Cit alone — the self cannot be destroyed.

RāmānujaclassicalB

The śāstra is one bracket (2.12 → 18.66)between

2.12Teaching proper begins.───→here2.19───→2.30Knowledge seam ends.

RāmānujaclassicalD

Karma-yoga as kainkarya (worship)approach

───→here2.19───→2.47Act, but not for the fruit of acting.

RāmānujaclassicalG

Māyā is real causal powerapproach

───→here2.19───→4.6Self-power, not self-illusion.

RāmānujaclassicalH

Prapatti / śaraṇāgati — universal upāyaapproach

───→here2.19───→4.11As they approach Me, so do I receive them.

Śabda · lemmas (25 unique · 28 occurrences)

भगवान् bhagavat — the Blessed One, Lord (possessor of bhaga 'fortune') · nominative masculine singular noun · also at 1.1, 2.11, 3.3, 3.32, 4.1, 5.10 +2

show all 25

आदि·आदयः ādi ×2 — beginning, origin; first; (suffix: 'X and so on') · compound / nominative masculine plural noun
अर्थम्·अर्थस्य artha ×2 — meaning, purpose, wealth, goal · nominative neuter singular noun / genitive masculine singular noun
मया·अहम् mad ×2 — I, me (1st person pronoun stem); also: to rejoice (verbal root) · instrumental singular noun / nominative singular noun
शोक śoka — grief, sorrow (from √śuc) · compound
मोह moha — delusion, infatuation, bewilderment · compound
संसार saṃsāra — the wheel of conditioned existence (sam- + √sṛ 'flow together') · compound · also at 1.1, 5.10, 9.3, 12.7, 12.8, 16.19
कारण kāraṇa — cause, reason · compound
निवृत्ति nivṛtti — cessation, withdrawal (ni- + √vṛt 'turn') · compound
गीता gītā — the Song; the Bhagavad-Gītā (past-pple. fem. of √gai) · compound
शास्त्रम् śāstra — scripture, treatise, authoritative teaching · nominative neuter singular noun
न na — not (negation particle)
प्रवर्तकम् pravartaka — instigator, originator (pra- + √vṛt + -aka) · nominative neuter singular noun
इति iti — thus (quotative particle)
एतस्य etad — this (proximal demonstrative) · genitive masculine singular noun
साक्षि sākṣin — witness (sa + akṣi 'eye'; one who sees with own eyes) · compound
भूते √bhū — to be, become; the earth (verbal root / noun) · accusative feminine dual participle noun
ऋचौ ṛc — ṛc verse; Ṛgveda · accusative feminine dual noun
आनिनाय √ānī — to bring near, lead to (ā- + √nī) · past indicative 3rd person singular verb
यत् yad — which, who (relative pronoun) · accusative neuter singular noun
तु tu — but, on the other hand (particle)
मन्यसे √man — to think, regard, consider (verbal root) · present indicative 2nd person singular verb · also at 2.26, 3.9, 11.4, 18.59
युद्धाः √yudh — to fight (verbal root); battle · nominative masculine plural participle noun
भीष्म bhīṣma — Bhīṣma (the Kuru patriarch); also: terrible, frightful · compound
हन्यन्ते √han — to slay, kill, strike (verbal root) · present indicative pass 3rd person plural verb

Praśna · so what (7)

01If ātman neither kills nor is killed, what is the precise ontological status of the warrior's action — is it real, apparent, or something between?
02The verse cites a Kaṭha Upaniṣad parallel — does the *śruti*-citation function as proof (*pramāṇa*) or as poetic amplification (*arthavāda*)?

show all 7

03Does 'not knowing' (*na vijānītaḥ*) refer to ignorance of a metaphysical fact, or to a practical moral error — and does the answer change what kind of correction is required?
04Rāmānuja reads *hanti* as *śarīraviyogakaraṇa* (causing bodily separation). Does this reading dissolve the verse's force, or does it create a sharper problem: who or what is the *kāraṇa* if not ātman?
05Vallabha limits *hanti* to composite, bodied entities (*sāvayava śarīra*). How does the *ahiṃsā* injunction (*na hiṃsyāt sarvā bhūtāni*) survive this reading — is it now a rule about bodies only?
06Madhusūdana distinguishes the *atiśūra* (supremely bold) and *atikātara* (supremely timid) as two possible framings of Arjuna's situation — how does this psychological typology interact with the metaphysical argument about non-agency?
07If all six schools agree ātman is not the killer, why does Bhagavān not simply stop here and dismiss the war? What work does 2.19 leave undone that subsequent verses must complete?

Vyavahāra · try it in your life

Advaita

When you are blamed for an outcome that harmed someone, notice the two-layered error: first, the identification of yourself with the body-mind that acted; second, the belief that the ātman inside that body-mind was the true locus of causation. Śaṅkara's *avikriya* teaching does not license indifference — it relocates accountability from metaphysical agency to conventional (*vyavahāra*) responsibility while refusing to let conventional guilt become existential self-condemnation.

Viśiṣṭādvaita

In service-oriented roles — care-giving, teaching, medicine — you routinely face outcomes where patients, students, or dependents suffer despite your action. Rāmānuja's reading of *hanti* as *śarīraviyogakaraṇa* reframes this: you can cause bodily-level separation or harm without being the destroyer of the person; the eternal jīvātman you serve remains untouched. This grounds compassionate action without the paralysis of omnipotent guilt.

show all 6

Dvaita

Madhva's *pratibimba* teaching applies when you feel the weight of a decision that will hurt others: the jīva, as reflection of Hari, is not the originating cause of any real event. Practically this means: act in dependence on Hari, do not arrogate to yourself the final authorship of consequence. The Dvaita practitioner reviews a difficult choice by asking 'is this what Hari's will, through scripture and dharma, directs?' rather than 'can I bear to be the cause of this?'

Śuddhādvaita

Vallabha's *sāvayava-śarīra* limitation of *hanti* speaks directly to the grief of those who have outlived a loved one: you did not destroy the person — you witnessed the separation of a composite body from its animating principle, which is Kṛṣṇa's own. The Puṣṭi-mārga application is to surrender the narrative of personal causation — 'I caused this death,' 'I failed to prevent it' — and rest in Kṛṣṇa's ultimate sovereignty over all separations.

Bhakti

Śrīdhara's two-grief structure is a practical diagnostic for moral distress: identify whether your suffering comes from loss (grief 1, addressed by ātman's deathlessness) or from guilt about your own role in harm (grief 2, addressed by ātman's non-agency). Many people conflate these and attempt to solve grief-1 with guilt-reasoning or vice versa; Śrīdhara's reading gives a precise triage: apply the correct teaching to the correct grief, and the path through is shorter.

Advaita-Bhakti

Madhusūdana's naming of the *tārkika* and *cārvāka* errors maps onto two modern failure modes: the person who over-philosophizes their agency ('I have free will, therefore I am fully responsible for every consequence, and therefore I am culpable') and the materialist who denies any persisting self ('there is no self, so nothing matters'). Both are forms of not-knowing. The Advaita-bhakti application is to hold both the reality of conventional moral seriousness (act with devotion, not nihilism) and the freedom from metaphysical self-condemnation (ātman is not destroyed by what it does in the body).

Adhiṣṭhāna · substrate signature

substratev2.6-frozen

parserByT5-Sanskrit-multitask (Nehrdich/Hellwig/Keutzer EMNLP 2024)

mūlaBelvalkar critical edition (BORI 1947), via Ambuda multi-witness

show all metadata

weightsa=1 · b=0.01 · e_v=0.005 · z=0.2 · h=0 · th=0.01

anchorfit on Ramsukhdas's Sādhak Sañjīvanī (1980), frozen across the eight-commentator panel; cross-validated R@4 = 71.6% on Śaṅkara

extracted2026-04-21

methodPaper 1, Section II.B

↓ view raw per-verse object (JSON)↗ per-verse-object schema ↗ substrate code (MIT) + data (CC-BY 4.0)

The schema generalizes to any bounded-polysemy corpus with discrete primary text units, attested witness traditions, identifiable schools, and formal substrate. Port the per-verse object; refit weights on a domain-appropriate Layer-3 anchor; ship.

Bhagavad Gītā Chapter 2, Verse 19: Krishna to Arjuna — Sāṅkhya-Yoga