Bhagavad Gītā Chapter 14, Verse 15: Krishna to Arjuna — Guṇatraya-Vibhāga-Yoga
Die in rajas and you are reborn among people swept up in restless, fruit-seeking action; die in tamas and you descend into the dull births of animal life.
Bhāṣyakāra purports
- Śaṅkaraadvaita
When rajas (the activating guna) is ascendant at the moment of death, the jiva (individual self) takes birth among human beings who are karmāsakti (bound by attachment to action) — those whose momentum is outward, accumulative, result-seeking. When tamas (the obscuring guna) is dominant at dissolution, the jiva descends into mūḍha-yoni (births of confusion) such as animal and lower forms, for tamas veils discriminative awareness entirely. Śaṅkara frames this as a compressed restatement of earlier verses: the gunas do not merely colour action in life but literally determine the trajectory of the jiva-stream at its most decisive juncture, until viveka (discrimination) dissolves guna-identification altogether.
- Rāmānujaviśiṣṭādvaita
Under expanded rajas at death, one is reborn in the households of those who perform karma for worldly fruit — svarga (heaven) and the like — thereby gaining adhikāra (eligibility) to pursue further fruit-oriented rites in that birth. Under expanded tamas, the jiva falls into mūḍha-yoni such as dogs and pigs, births that are sarvapuruṣārtha-arambha-anarha (unfit for the pursuit of any human end). Rāmānuja's framing is functionalist: each birth carries a specific ritual and devotional capacity, and tamas-birth forfeits that capacity entirely, making return to bhakti-yoga preparation a longer arc.
- Madhvadvaita
Reconstructed from the dvaita school's doctrine, not translated from Madhva's commentary at this verse.
Rajasi pralayaṃ gatvā karma-saṅgiṣu jāyate — the jīva (individual self) whose death occurs under the dominance of rajas (the quality of passion and restless activity) is reborn among those bound to karma, action-saturated human births where bhakti (devotion) remains structurally possible yet perpetually crowded by craving and motion. Tathā pralīnas tamasi mūḍha-yoniṣu jāyate — the jīva whose dissolution occurs under tamas (the quality of inertia and obscuration) descends into mūḍha-yoni, the births of the deluded — animal and sub-human orders — where jñāna (knowledge) of svatantra (the independently real, self-sufficient) Hari is most deeply occluded. The pañca-bheda (the five-fold real distinction: Lord–jīva, Lord–matter, jīva–jīva, jīva–matter, matter–matter) is not dissolved by either descent: the jīva remains paratantra (eternally dependent) through every birth. These births are not the mechanical output of impersonal guṇa-momentum; Hari's sovereign will governs which yoni receives which jīva, the guṇas being instruments of that dispensation, not its ground. Taratamya (graded ontological hierarchy) obtains even here: births in rajas retain greater proximity to bhakti than births deep in tamas, yet neither proximity nor distance alters the jīva‘s essential paratantra nature.
- Vallabhaśuddhādvaita
Vallabha's commentary is terse and vertical: rajas at death → birth in madhyama-loka (the middle worlds) among karma-saturated people; tamas at death → adho-yoni (lower births) in nīca-loka (lower realms). The Puṣṭi-mārga inference is that neither trajectory is final — Kṛṣṇa's prasāda (grace) can interrupt the guna-sequence at any point, since the gunas themselves are His līlā. The verse is not a counsel of despair but a map of obstruction: where gunas occlude Kṛṣṇa's own sweetness from the jiva's view.
- Śrīdharabhakti
Śrīdhara reads the verse as a plain bhāṣya expansion of the prior two: rajas ascendant at death → birth among humans who are karmāsakta (attached to action, action-sticky); tamas ascendant at death → birth in paśv-ādi (animal and like births), where buddhi (intelligence) is dulled below the threshold of spiritual inquiry. The devotional implication is left implicit in Śrīdhara's balanced voice but is structurally present: only sattva at death opens the door upward (as BG 14.14 just stated), making the cultivation of sāttvika qualities in daily practice the single most consequential preparation for death.
- Madhusūdanaadvaita-bhakti
Madhusūdana refines Śaṅkara's summary by specifying the quality of the karmāsakta human births under rajas: they are births among those who are adhikāri (entitled) for both śruti-smṛti-vihita (prescribed) and pratiṣiddha (prohibited) karmas and their fruits — meaning, people fully enmeshed in the dharmic-adharmic fruit-economy. Tamas at death → paśv-ādi (animal and like births), identical to Śaṅkara. Madhusūdana's synthesis: knowledge without bhakti cannot dissolve guna-dominance at the critical moment, and bhakti without knowledge cannot recognise which guna is ascendant — the two faculties must mature together for the death-moment to be clear.